The recent Climate movie is awful, filled with science fiction and drive by character attacks.

The recent "Climate, The Movie" is awful, filled with science fiction and drive by character attacks.

Consensus climate science is repeatedly insulted by the fact that it is government funded, rather than refuting the science itself.

The first 30 minutes tries to con(vince) viewers manmade CO2 emissions do nothing because temperature changes cause CO2 changes. That is ignoring added CO2 in the atmosphere as a cause of global warming (aka. A climate forcing).

One serious logic error is using guesses of historical, local climates (climate proxy reconstructions) with NO manmade CO2 emissions, to make conclusions about the climate effects of manmade CO2 emissions.

Skeptical Science listed 25 myths in the film. I agree with more than half of them.

Because this film is so bad, the BEST news is that Facebook is censoring it. That fact, assuming it is true, is worth a lot more in the anti-CAGW debate than the film itself.

The film was an opportunity to:

(1) Explain lab spectroscopy of CO2

(2) Explain the controversial water vapor positive feedback theory that allegedly converts harmless AGW to potentially dangerous CAGW

(3) Evidence of manmade warming after 1975 versus less evidence of natural warming

(4) The experience of the past 48 years of actual global warming (a more pleasant winter climate in most nations and greening of our planet)

(5) Most important is detailing the 44 years in a row of wrong CAGW predictions

In my opinion, the film struck out for all of those five important subjects.

Especially when it tried to convince viewers CO2 does nothing and quoted climate science idiot John Clauser saying exactly that.

Richard Greene

Ye Editor

(BS, MBA)

Bingham Farms, Michigan

Where we love global warming and our plants love more CO2